I’ve learned that it’s good to go into sewer meetings prepared!
In June, a meeting of the Wilmette Village Board featured a “value engineering” study of the proposed Storm Sewer Improvement project.
In preparing for the meeting, I decided it was important to counterbalance the estimated cost for the proposed improvements, with the estimated cost of continued westside flooding, something that I’ve yet to see quantified in a comprehensive way.
After the meeting, several people asked me to explain the basis for my calculations, so here it is, with a few minor tweaks and “what ifs” to consider.
Data Sources
All my estimates are based on data from the Village of Wilmette, engineering studies paid for by Wilmette, the RainReady program of the Center for Neighborhood Technology, the US census, and Zillow.
For the board meeting, I made calculations using low-end numbers, to provide a base estimate of monetary losses due to westside flooding. Realistically, flood costs are probably much higher than what I reported at the meeting.
Calculating Westside Flood Damages
STEP ONE: Typical Cost of Flooding
First, I found the average payout for flood insurance and disaster relief claims filed by Cook County property owners. Based on CNT data, it looks like typical payouts range from $9,047 to $16,505:

CNT, The Prevalence and Cost of Urban Flooding: (May 2014), p 5.
I also found a CNT survey of Cook County residents that attempts to identify the full range of flooding issues. No surprise–flooding can be stressful and unhealthy! Flooding also typically leads to a combination of structural damage, property loss, and loss of work time, resulting in a combined total of up to $30,661 in damages.
To be conservative, I decided to base my westside flooding costs on a low-end number: $7,769 which is the average cost of structural damage per flood.

CNT, The Prevalence and Cost of Urban Flooding (May 2014), p 8.
STEP TWO: Impacted Properties Based on Storm Severity
In the June sewer meeting packet, I found the number of westside Wilmette properties expected to be damaged at each storm intensity.
The numbers are based on Burke Engineering models (described in the 2015 study), which incorporate hydraulics (existing sewer pipes), hydrologic (rainfall) data, permeable ground area, and elevations. Burke also matched residents’ flood reports to the models, confirming validity of the data. Predictably, the more severe the storm, the more structures are impacted:

Wilmette Village Board, Meeting Information Packet: COW Stormwater Value-Engineering Study (June 2017), p 3.
STEP THREE: Our Recent Storm History, Based on Storm Severity
I used Wilmette Water Plant stats on rainstorms to determine how many storms, at each intensity level, Wilmette has experienced over the past three decades:
STEP FOUR: Total Westside Wilmette Storm Costs
Finally, to calculate total estimated flood costs for Wilmette westsiders, over the past three and half decades, I simply multiplied (storm occurrences x impacts x cost per impact) as shown next:
Just to establish a more complete range of estimated flood damages, I decided to repeat the calculations, using a higher value for damages: $15,000 which is still within reported ranges.
In conclusion, westsiders have probably suffered somewhere between $45M to $87M in flood damages over the past three and half decades.
Another Flooding Impact: Overall Property Devaluation
In addition to the immediate damages from each storm event, there’s also a long-term impact on property values.
According to the CNT case study (The Prevalence and Cost, p 24), homes that experience basement flooding lose 10 to 25 percent of their value.
To calculate the total impact on westside property values, I went to Zillow and looked for the low end of home sale prices on the westside, and came up with $309,746. However, since then, I’ve located the Median Wilmette Home Value, reported in the US Census Quick Facts for 2015, which was $629,000.
Next, I multiplied the low and median home values by 700 (total impacted homes) to get total affected property value, then calculated a 10 and 25 percent loss:
At the June meeting, I reported on my low-end estimate of property devaluation. But the actual impact of flooding on westside property values is likely to be somewhere in between $21M to $110M.
Additional Thoughts…
As usual, investigation leads to more “ah ha” moments, as well as some head scratching.
Such as:
- We’ve had so-called “2-year” storms more frequently than every two years. These storms result in westside storm sewer surcharging. Do we have data to calculate low-level storm damages?
- My calculations are based past storm data. But due to climate change, we are seeing worse–not better–rainfall trends. So how much worse will future flooding be?
- The proposed storm sewer project will prevent flooding damages for 10-year storms. But how much can we expect to benefit from an overall reduction in frequency/severity of flooding?
- Can we leverage the benefits of grey infrastructure projects by incorporating green infrastructure and development/design changes?
- If sewers represent a long-term investment, shouldn’t Wilmette be making decisions based on 50- to 100-year village infrastructure and development plans?
Very helpful analysis. Agree that climate predictions of the next 50-100 years suggest we (here in the upper midwest) should expect storms of greater frequency and intensity than we have seen in the past 50-100 years, which leads me to favor a more aggressive solution.
On the other hand, I remain a bit confused as to how we calculate the # of structures impacted. If the definition is “water within 1 foot of the highest lot elevation” then “impact” does not equate directly to “damage”. Most homes have foundations that are raised well above the ground, so I would be interested to know how many homes have actually had water damage and with what frequency and severity. Related, it would be helpful to know how much of the damage stems from sewer back-ups (with associated health risks) vs. clean water seepage/leaking.
One side point: how much damage could be avoided with prudent management of basement areas? In the “old days” leakage was somewhat expected and basements were used largely for off-the-ground storage and utilities (shelving, washing machines elevated on blocks, etc.) . To what extent are residents practicing “safe storage” or are they finishing basements in ways that invite problems?
One comment on the calculations: If a 10-year storm affects 120 structures, a series of give 10-year storms does not necessarily affect 600 structures. It could be that the same 120 structures are affected five times over. The total damage remains the same, but the solutions may differ (e.g. grading and perimeter drain tiles to keep water away from the foundation until the sewers can catch up and the ground can absorb more water; it’s also possible to install sewer valves that close when the sewer back-up — we have that system at our house).
Hi Tom,
Thanks for taking the time to read through all the facts and figures. One thing we’ve heard over and over from the engineers over the past five years of meetings and studies is that the westside has an unfortunate combination of bad factors: lots of post-WWII development and therefore impermeable surfaces, no natural overland storm flow routes, flat terrain (as in no incline in some areas), and clay soil making it difficult to infiltrate with water. That’s why, in 2013, hundreds of westsiders came to engineering open houses to report problems, which were used to calibrate the flood maps. And small changes in one spot seem to wreak havoc in another spot. I explain more of this here: http://sewersofwilmette.com/estimating-flooding-structures-vs-properties/
Karleen
Also, I wanted to answer your main question, but don’t want to leave the wrong impression… As I’ve tried to communicate on this blog, westside flood solutions are not an either/or situation. We need the storm sewer upgrade + homeowner wet/dry floodproofing + smart development + green infrastructure.
Thanks, Karleen. This is all incredibly helpful. Great work!
Tom